________________________________
From: Ti tengo d'occhio <info@titengodocchio.it>
To: LibreOffice@bielefeldundbuss.de
Cc: Roman Eisele <post@roman-eisele.de>; Marc Paré <marc@marcpare.com>;
libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org; accessibility@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Friday, 31 August 2012, 10:35
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-accessibility] [Libreoffice-qa] Adding "Accessibility" component to Bug
Assistant
Hi Rainer,
well, I didn't know that there were developers focused on specific components; in this case adding
an "accessibility component" won't be the best thing to do, in my opinion…
At this point I think we could go for solution C or solution A; in case of solution A, would it
be possible to view all issues with the pseudo-keyword "accessibility"?
However I think that solution C could be very suitable; in drupal, for instance, to report
accessibility issues there are two special tags:
- Accessibility: it means that this is an accessibility issue (it could be a bug, a feature
request, a task, etc etc) ;
- "needs accessibility review": this means that the issue or the patch to solve it needs to be
tested by a blind user or an accessibility expert.
Now we could choose to use only the "accessibility" keyword or maybe both "accessibility" and
"needs accessibility review", I don't know; but also using just the first keyword would be a great
thing…
Vincenzo.
Il giorno 31/ago/2012, alle ore 06:36, Rainer Bielefeld <LibreOffice@bielefeldundbuss.de> ha
scritto:
Ti tengo d'occhio schrieb:
in my opinion it would be great to have a component for accessibility;
it could let developers to better focus on accessibility bugs and, on
the other hand, blind people to know that accessibility is important for
this project and that submitting bug reports of this type is more than
encouraged…
Hi,
the advantage of an "Accessibility" Component would be that it can easily be selected from a
pulldown, no typos or other mistakes can happen.But a problem is that an "Accessibility"
Component would not indicate what developer might be the one who can fix the problem. So it
always would be replaced during the bug triaging and fixing process.
An other possibility would be a Whiteboard entry, but that only can be done after a report in a
second step, typos might happen, it is too modest.
So I currently think about a Bug Submission Assistant enhancement. We can add a checkbox
"Accessibility affected", and the Assistant will add "Accessibility"
a) as additional pseudo key word to the Bug Summary line. The advantage of this solution is that
the key word would be very visible.
or
b) as additional pseudo key word to the whiteboard
or will
c) set Key word "Accessibility" to the Keyword pane (it should not be a problem to get this new
key word from FDO). The advantae of this solution is that it also eases and unifies handling in
Bugzilla itself, not only via BSA.
And of course
d) New Component "Accessibility"
still can be discussed.
My order of preference (descending):
c - a - b - d
Your opinion?
When we have a solution here, we can start to mark and process accessibility bugs with increased
priority.
Best regards
Rainer
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to accessibility+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/accessibility/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to accessibility+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/accessibility/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.