Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last


Hi Dennis,

At 22:37 3-10-2011, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
(...) In a discussion of mailing-list etiquette, there was a link to an useful web page by Italo Vignoli: <http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette>. (...) Now there are two questions: 1. What practices using e-mail messages best support accessibility to mailing-list conversations? (or, if that is too broad, what practices definitely discourage accessibility). I would prefer that those who use accessibility provision answer for themselves. 2. If this is not the best place to ask, what is another place that might be a good place to find answers to this question. If there is no "right" answer, I can be with that. But if there is a preference I would prefer to honor it.

Trimming quoted text is obviously a good idea.

With regard to top-posting versus bottom-posting: I have seen discussions about this on other mailing lists, for example most recently at <http://webaim.org/discussion/mail_thread?thread=4827&id=18223#18223>. Jared Smith of WebAIM wrote: "The debate over top-posting vs. bottom-posting will never be resolved." And that reflects the outcome of other discussions on this topic.

Best regards,

Christophe




- Dennis E. Hamilton
    tools for document interoperability,
  <http://nfoWorks.org/>
    dennis.hamilton@acm.org  gsm: +1-206-779-9430  @orcmid
-----Original Message-----
From: Italo Vignoli [mailto:italo.vignoli@gmail.com] <http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/msg07696.html> Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2011 13:20
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Top Posting... On 10/02/2011 08:38 PM,
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: <http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/msg07693.html> [ ... ] > 2. I have an offer. What formatting by senders will most powerfully serve those on [libreoffice-accessibility]? What do those with access limitations confirm to be the best that works for all of them? Whatever *that* is, I will do everything in my power to honor. I am not an expert about accessibility, but I recall that this is one of the cases where top posting is the best choice. I suggest to have a double check, though, as I am not competent in this domain. [ ... ]

--
Christophe Strobbe
K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD
Research Group on Document Architectures
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442
B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee
BELGIUM
tel: +32 16 32 85 51
http://www.docarch.be/
Twitter: @RabelaisA11y
---
Open source for accessibility: results from the AEGIS project www.aegis-project.eu
---
Please don't invite me to Facebook, Quechup or other "social networks". You may have agreed to their "privacy policy", but I haven't.


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to accessibility+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/accessibility/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.