Bonjour à tous,
À propos des régressions, je copie ici les minutes de l'ESC :
* Proposal to TDF board to have regression prevention as a future key
goal (Ilmari)
+ Volunteer contributors are not in a position to know how paid
development relates to regressions of arbitrary age – unrealistic
expectations sometimes
+ Increasing automation etc. is something concrete we can do to reduce
the friction between volunteers in the various teams and paid devs
+ Budget items would be optional, can also focus existing resources
+ Good to send a positive message to volunteers through action and
acknowledgement
+ Maybe make it an initiation ritual that newcomer devs tackle a
cppunit test immediately after their first trivial easy hack
+ Invest in figuring out how to integrate the automated triaging
system Bugbug into our Bugzilla after we upgrade to 6
https://github.com/mozilla/bugbug
+ brought this proposal to the board, they said come to the ESC
+ they way the key goals work is that the TDF staff focuses on these
areas
+ may also have some budget associated
+ sounds really encouraging (Michael M)
+ the last output from ESC’s budget ranking contained no testing
topics, other than a11y testing
+ Xisco may have ideas where to focus
+ Some areas are hard to test (Michael M)
+ could also cover things like automated triaging (Ilmari)
+ is it looking for duplicates? (Michael M)
+ also adds metadata (Ilmari)
+ anything that helps to get staff to work on this area is great
(Thorsten)
+ also educate: just because XY worked on an area, can’t expect to
fix any related problems/regressions forever (Miklos)
+ not easy to solve this
+ fail to see the benefit of putting this as a key goal, though (Xisco)
+ acts as a license for us to focus on this when doing mentoring
(Ilmari)
+ could have a PDF validator (Xisco, Thorsten)
+ question: “Should the board made regression prevention a key goal?”
=> yes, that makes sense (All)
Ilmari a fait cette proposition lors de la dernière réunion des
directeurs et il lui a été demandé de la présenter à l'ESC pour accord.
C'est donc chose faite. Si vous avez des idées et propositions
d'améliorations de la chaîne de tests, n'hésitez pas.
À bientôt
Sophie
--
Sophie Gautier sophi@libreoffice.org
GSM: +33683901545
IRC: sophi
Foundation coordinator
The Document Foundation
--
Envoyez un mail à discuss+unsubscribe@fr.libreoffice.org pour vous désinscrire
Les archives de la liste sont disponibles à https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/fr/discuss/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
Context
- [fr-discuss] Proposition à propos des régressions · sophi
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.