Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2014 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Wednesday 15 October 2014 10:34:39 PM Tim---Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
 
The key to me is not whether or not it is a fork, child, or any other
relation to the original OOo project, but the fact that the people
behind LibreOffice in the early days decided that they did not want to
see the idea of an FOSS office suite package to die do to the lack of
"caring" by the one who owns the brand name of the current FOSS
package.  

All very well, but the original context was defining the term "fork" to someone 
who had never heard the term. By now, I'm sure, she's hopelessly confused, and 
a little sorry she asked. ;-)

-- 
Bruce Byfield 604-421-7189 (on Pacific time)
blog: https://brucebyfield.wordpress.com
website: http://members.axion.net/~bbyfield/

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.