Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


I'm sure lot of people use it. In my previous job, we made every online
documentation like this (with WORD), I didn't achieve to made them
understand a wiki would be better, for design, usability,
maintainability... This function is far from perfect but I'm sure it's used
a lot. Then the choice between writer.IE.Netscape isn't useful at all for
me...

Kévin

2012/11/5 Jay Lozier <jslozier@gmail.com>

 On 11/05/2012 08:18 AM, Kévin PEIGNOT wrote:

Hi Rob, Jay

That's right, HTML export produce very, very bad HTML product (just try to
export a white page...) and that exporting styles to a separated CSS file
(or at list a separated section) would be better. Then according this
option, I added this one in the whiteboard
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/Analyses/Global_Options#Load.2FSave

Kévin

I agree that exporting to html is not a very useful option partly because
it does not (can not?) produce easily maintainable html code. The fact the
code probably works is less important than that maintaining/editing the
code is very difficult.

Should we ask on the users list if anyone uses export to html and if so
what is their opinion?

Jay


2012/11/5 Jay Lozier <jslozier@gmail.com>

On 11/04/2012 04:14 PM, Rob Snelders wrote:

Hi all,

The export-option in the options-dialog -> Load/Save ->
HTML-compatibility states that you can save for LibreOffice Writer,
Internet Explorer and Netscape Navigator. Looking at the code that states
Netscape 4-compatibility.
But has this still any value? As the browsers are for basic HTML
compatible for some years. I think that the Netscape output also works in
Internet Explorer.
If it still has value then the name netscape navigator should change as
less and less people know what Netscape is.

This bug triggerd the question:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56726

--
Greetings,
Rob Snelders

 Rob,

From the few times I exported as html, I noticed the html produced
appeared to be fairly standard html 4.01. The main problem I noticed is
that all the styles are embedded in the html. Note, I believe this is legal
html, if now considered bad practice The export modules do not produce a
CSS page. This makes the resulting html, IMHO, very difficult to maintain.

You can check your html at http://validator.w3.org/

I find I prefer to save the text as txt file then cut and then directly
create the html page(s) and CSS pages I need.

--
Jay Lozier
jslozier@gmail.com



--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted




--
Jay Lozierjslozier@gmail.com



-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.