Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


The wysiwyg editor's buttons are set at admin by checking off a box.

The requirements you list are going to make a very boring website.
I'll fix this later

We grow beautiful ideas

On Oct 19, 2010, at 11:30 AM, Christian Lohmaier
<lohmaier+ooofuture@googlemail.com> wrote:

Hi Keith,

On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Keith Williams
<kwilliams@thoughtfarmproductions.com> wrote:

I basically built the demo to show a couple features like groups, polls,
etc...

I don't know how many times I wrote it already: No matter what it
could do, at least it must meet the basic requirements first.

I hoped that someone else would put some content on the site at some
point.  AND NO I didn't set it up for editors,

But how should the people that will then actually use the page come up
with an opinion?
If you just tell "everything can be tweaked to death, to whatever you
like", but don't provide a basic setup that works, then you won't get
much positive votes.

I guess I could turn on the
WYSIWYG editor and let you make page menus.  I just didn't want to give the
testuser account the ability to change the top menus.

The WYSIWYG editor that is available now is not suitable. Again it
doesn't provide a way to create headings and the like.

And with the pages that were enabled now: Beware to never create a
page without assigning it to a menu, or otherwise you'll never be able
to dig it out again unless you bookmarked it.

We're talking about setting up a cms for website maintainence, not for
a site that hosts news bits or blogs or other bite-sized whatnot.
A structured website, similar to what www.openoffice.org is now.

I can't do that with Drupal.  But I did say WOW I'm glad I don't have to
work with this to build interactive websites.

You didn't see anything that made you say "wow" in the lists of
additions to silverstripe. But I don't see anything that does even
make me say "OK, that would work" with the drupal demo.

Again I stress that I don't doubt that one can build a site that fits
the needs, just the demo is nowhere near the initial requirements, not
even close I have to say.

Most of the sites that are coming online now are similar to social
networking sites where people can connect with each other and collaborate.

The LO site will not be a twitter or facebook like page. It should be
a place where endusers find information, at least as the primary
function.

(please don't do fullquotes)

ciao
Christian

--
E-mail to website+help@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/website/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


-- 
E-mail to website+help@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/website/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.