[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libreoffice-website] Wiki Discussion (Reboot)
- Subject: Re: [libreoffice-website] Wiki Discussion (Reboot)
- From: Benjamin Horst <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:56:21 -0400
- To: email@example.com
For anyone interested in the general topic of wikis, a Foswiki community member suggested using the following page to compare and contrast different engines. Here, for example, are MediaWiki and Foswiki side-by-side:
While LibreOffice's wiki is now set up, this may become helpful in some future circumstance.
On Oct 7, 2010, at 2:54 PM, Christoph Noack wrote:
> Hi Benjamin,
> it seems that we have to hurry up. Things didn't stand still (although
> some people might think so), and a wiki has been prepared in the
> meantime. As I said yesterday, it should be available in no time - if we
> "omit" the request for proper handling of languages ;-)
> Thus, I'll forward your mail to the admins to make sure that they get
> your statements, okay?
> Am Donnerstag, den 07.10.2010, 13:35 -0400 schrieb Benjamin Horst:
>> Forwarding from the discuss@ list to the website@ list...
>> I like MediaWiki and use it extensively, including as an intranet wiki
>> at my current workplace. I recognize it's the default choice because
>> that's what OOo has been using and because it is well and
> Also by admins :-) And by the current user base of the OOoWiki. So if we
> change something, then we require really good arguments to convince
> them ... it is like a migration of one major commercial office suite to
> an open ... aehm ... libre one ;-)
>> However, it was not designed for the use-case of an intranet or
>> project management wiki. [...]
>> Foswiki: http://foswiki.org/
>> MoinMoin: http://moinmo.in/
>> DokuWiki: http://www.dokuwiki.org/
>> MediaWiki: http://www.mediawiki.org/
>> Wikipedia's list of wiki engines is here:
> I tried to follow the CMS discussion today, and what me puzzles is, that
> we require a wiki very soon and the time for people evaluating another
> installation is also very limited, sigh. How to balance "get a good
> wiki" and "get a wiki soon"?
> Another thing I'd like to consider is, that we have some content that
> might be migrated from the OOoWiki ... I wrote many proposals and
> requirement specifications I'd like to add to LibO, too. But this is my
> problem at the moment :-)
>> I'd like to suggest this mailing list work on the information
>> architecture for the forthcoming project site and wiki, in parallel to
>> our other threads investigating CMS and wiki platforms to build upon.
> My proposal: Let's ask the others for some comments ... and maybe our
> intermediate but heroic admins like Florian or Guy, or Christian will
> To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
> List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/website/
> All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
To unsubscribe, e-mail to email@example.com
List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/website/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
|Re: [libreoffice-website] Wiki Discussion (Reboot)||Keith Williams <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|[libreoffice-website] Wiki Discussion (Reboot)||Benjamin Horst <email@example.com>|
|Re: [libreoffice-website] Wiki Discussion (Reboot)||Christoph Noack <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
- Prev by Date: Re: [libreoffice-website] Website and wiki design
- Next by Date: Re: [libreoffice-website] Wiki Discussion (Reboot)
- Previous by thread: Re: [libreoffice-website] Wiki Discussion (Reboot)
- Next by thread: Re: [libreoffice-website] Wiki Discussion (Reboot)