Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2015 Archives by date, by thread · List index


I think that the prototype site would most benefit from an
analysis/proposal by the like the ones they do
on their blog: (that get published also
on the Planet site).

They could analyse/propose the main page designs, especially:
- both template and extensions site home page;
- particular extension/template page with its tabs;

That would mean an independent professional assessment of the current
design and a proposal to go further.

2015-04-02 18:21 GMT+02:00 Andreas Mantke <>:
Thus it's not useful to spread it on social media but maybe on the
project-list and the ux-list (I'm not subscribed to the latter one)

Plus, I think that actual discussion about the extensions website
should in this phase be moved to the UX list (and return to this list
as soon as the final design is decided upon and it needs to be
implemented, tested etc.).

Lp, m.

To unsubscribe e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.