Rainer Bielefeld wrote (03-08-11 16:37)
that's a 3.4 branch build - also interesting for particular research,
but not the best for my needs. Because of the new proceeding that in
future all branch fixes should be cherry picked from Master, Master
should be in a much better shape than the last one I saw is. And that
means: more testing with Master!
Though I think it will not be a general rule for all future versions
that fixes will be picked from master .... of course I agree with you
that more testing on the master and more regular available builds, are
Sorry that I did not pick from the issue that you pointed to the master
build in particular.
My hope was that Website team might find a way to make sure that no
Master will be deleted before a new one has been uploaded.
Tomorrow I will ask again for more WIN Master builds.
From IIRC the dev-list I understand that it does have the attention of
people. But you may have seen that yourself.
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy