Le 2011-07-18 18:07, C. Olofson a écrit :
In short, we will not host closed-source but we can reference it for the
good of the larger community. I believe this is preferable for two reasons:
* this site becomes a comprehensive resource to the community
* the conditions are an incentive for non-GNU developers to re-think
* TDF actively demonstrates inclusiveness yet again.
Italo, thank you again for responding. And if this isn't the proper
forum for this thread, please point me in the right direction. I am only
now understanding how difficult it is to manage the volume of messaging
going on in this product.
We had talked very briefly on, perhaps, referencing extensions and
templates that didn't fit due to their licensing but didn't really come
to a conclusion.
We could all make suggestions and see if we could come to a consensus.
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
- Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: Extension-Template-Website: Categories need explanation (continued)
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy