Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Hi David, all,

after re-rereading some of the messages, I now realize my own 
misunderstanding: I've mixed up Alfresco and Litmus issues as the 
Alfresco thing was talked about in the Litmus thread. My fault, sorry 
for that. 

So my communication analysis (which you have not read anyways) is 
therefore invalid in this regard. 

Let me try a new reply to the Litmus part of your post:

On Tuesday 26 April 2011 19:50, David Nelson wrote:

As regards the Litmus link, I saw there was a Litmus link in the wikt
top menu so I updated site pages with links to Litmus
- an act of innocent goodwill!

Ok, as for me, I can perfectly understand this. But according to the 
Litmus team, the promiment position of the link was not a good idea. So 
it was removed in the meantime. Correct?

Can we therefore now regard the Litmus issue as closed? Litmus should be 
announced prominently only when the Litmus team announces its 

As for Alfresco, I'll try to look at the thread tomorrow, if I have the 
time and if there is still need to clarify things.


Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.