Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Narayan, *,

On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 5:53 AM, Narayan Aras <narayanaras@hotmail.com> wrote:

   If the page contains multiple links, it becomes difficult to spot the broken link.

Yes, the link-checker is rather fragile in the sense that when it
encounters something it doesn't expect, it will have
"carry-on-errors".

But on pages where there really are broken links, the corresponding
link will be highlighted with a red background in the editor.

We tried looking for such indications, but cannot see such links at all.
Can you have a look at the "Broken links" report at SS and revert? Thanks in advance.

Sorry, I don't understand - what do you mean with revert?
The broken links report is somewhat unreliable, so when you don't have
the red background highlighting within the editor, then all is fine.

I didn't look into what exactly is causing the broken-links report to fail yet.

ciao
Christian

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.