Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi guys,

as discussed two days ago, I've updated the website wiki page a bit ...

Am Freitag, den 28.01.2011, 10:42 +0930 schrieb Michael Wheatland:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Christoph Noack <christoph@dogmatux.com> wrote:
[...]
What do you think, might it be helpful? What's missing?

Ideas:
* Infrastructure we are responsible for: www.libreoffice.org, template
library, extension library, wiki(s), forum(?), social networking,
Assistance/maintenance of other teams' web tools

I kept the original text, I've copied from the website mailing list
description on the TDF page. Working on the other items would be cool,
but I currently miss a clear statement whether the team will take care
about that. Maybe something to discuss when the team's overall goals are
developed?

* Changing the IRC channel to a 'website team' IRC channel. Possibly
Freenode: #LibOWebsite

Good idea - but since we are currently missing the channel, I've kept
the info of the original page. Instead, I've contacted Florian to know
what he has in mind (he created the current channels). I've also
searched the wiki for some more IRC information, but I didn't find any.
I'll report back ...

* Add a link to the Nabble interface for the mailing list:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Website-f1644957.html

Done.

* Maybe instead of 'SC assigned contacts' we should have 'People to
contact if you need help to contribute', that way the heavy lifting
isn't done by very few and others can add their names.

Done - but I changed the text a bit and put the categories (like
Infrastructure) at the very beginning of each entry. You may be right
that we don't need the "heavy lifting" as you said - if there are
further questions, then we might simply refer to the SC statement.

I think we should also move the work that was done under the heading
of the 'Drupal dev' to the /website/development/* area. A lot of work
has gone into discussions with the different teams regarding
workflows, requirements and roles.
Also aligning the development work into one effort is exactly what is
happening with the team. This is something that I can work on once the
main page has been restructured.

This would be cool, thanks. Initially, I thought to keep the content on
the page and add something like "to be migrated", but it seems to be
less ambiguous if I simply refer to the history entry:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/index.php?title=Website&oldid=10744


In general, I hope the current page fits a bit better - if not, please
don't hesitate to improve it :-)

Cheers,
Christoph


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.