Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Hi Klaus-Jürgen,

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 7:53 PM, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol
<> wrote:

I'm not glad that you change this so quickly.
There was last year a discussion about that. And if we change it we should
wait some time but not only for 45 minutes.

Change it back, please, and let us disuss this before we make facts.

Sorry, I didn't think there would be much contention about what
appears (to me at least) to be a small change - especially since the
strong tag had the same color as links, which is a usability concern.
In future I'll leave more time before making a request (Erich, sorry
for the inconvenience).

So, let's discuss (I guess we'll have to do it again, because last
year's discussions pertain to the old theme, and lots of things
changed in the meantime without being discussed here).

IMO, <strong> should, by default, just make text bold; it should, by
default, inherit its color from the parent element. If people want a
green <strong> tag, they should use something like <strong
class="green">, but then it should be a darker green so as not to be
confused with links.


Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
List archive:
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.