Hi David, all, :-)
David Nelson schrieb:
Hi Klaus, Bernhard, Florian, all, :-)
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 05:38, Bernhard Dippold
PPS: I still believe, that the visible part of the main page should not
contain more than a few lines of text, a download button (can lead to
the "scrolling area" are ok, but I think a "news" area is more important
than those tow.
I will put at least a download button above the home page text, but
did not get around to it yet. You will notice that I *have* been
listening to people's comments, and complying with most of them.
Sorry if my posting had any negative taste - I didn't mean this at all.
The problem is that the current theme is very narrow, and limits what
you can place on the page quite a lot. That applies to the top menu
bar, the side menu and the actual content area.
That's not a bug - it's a feature. ;-)
The main page shouldn't contain more than the most important information
for every visitor (or at least for the majority of them).
It must be readable in a few seconds - and then lead the visitor to the
area of interest.
I'll try to write something to show what I mean - don't know if this
will be possible today.
I would propose a theme based on the theme at
libreofficeaustralia.org. Take a look at screenshots  and . The
design perfectly fits the current marketing color scheme and graphic
charter. It's simple but very Web 2.0. It's based on the Fusion theme
for Drupal. It gives a lot more space and scope for nicely laying out
the content, with lots of nice big screenshots, etc.
I didn't comment on the Drupal page by now, because I didn't have the
time to have a closer look than just the first screenshots. This will
become one of my tasks after the LibO 3.3 release.
For the moment just a few remarks to your idea of using this theme for
the present website:
I can't see the screenshots without horizontal scrolling - something I
really would like to avoid.
I don't know the minimal window size necessary for the Drupal site to
look good, but here (with 1080px window width) the screenshot doesn't.
Colors look too dark for representing a libre and open office suite and
a contributor friendly community.
The entire text area is crowded - borders are too narrow, not enough
space over headings.
And I don't like drop-down menus on websites, because they modify the
visual impression very much.
But all of these point are manageable before the Drupal site will become
active - I just wanted to tell you, that I don't support using this
theme for the SilverStripe site.
What do you think, guys?
a) We'd get a lot more flexibility with the content.
Please keep the minimum page width (without scrolling) of 990 px (some
netbooks only have 1024x768 displays - and these are the system
requirements for LibreOffice too).
At the moment the page content is about 100px less in width, and the
text area is just 700px - this could be broadened IMHO.
With 990px width the screenshot shuffler would cover not more than half
of the text area - this might be enough to correct the impression that
it would be the main content on the page.
I don't think that any text area broader than 800 px would allow us to
have a consistent look and feel on different screens.
This would mean to reduce the width of the content in a two-parted main
area to about 390 px, three part with 260 px are nearly that what we
have on the homepage besides the screenshot shuffler.
I don't think that we should divide the homepage in such small parts,
but for buttons / links / RSS feeds it might be a possible alternative.
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to email@example.com<website%2Bhelp@libreoffice.org>
List archive: http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/website/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy