Hi Bernhard,
Bernhard Dippold wrote on 2010-12-14 21.30:
As we work on content to be included in the product in our wiki, I've
been thinking about adding a second license to the wiki upload: LGPL.
So the contributor can choose between:
- CC
- LGPL
- CC & LGPL double license (I'd prefer as default)
What do you think?
Would this be a question for the SC?
I'm no license expert -- why do you want to do so, what would be the
benefits?
Florian
--
Florian Effenberger <floeff@documentfoundation.org>
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/website/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.