Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
August 2020 Archives by date, by thread · List index


https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91886

--- Comment #11 from Mike Kaganski <mikekaganski@hotmail.com> ---
(In reply to João Paulo from comment #10)

Again - please don't forget that not only "it should be done because someone
possibly would ever need it" matters, but also "... and making it possible is
maintainable - i.e. allows testing that it works".

If something is a resource, and its absence breaks functionality, than this is
not optional. Built-in things like font substitution expects to find those
fonts => they are required for correct operation. Unless someone volunteers to
perform complete audit, and also provide extensive set of unit tests to cover
"no fonts" scenario -> WF IMO.

But removing unnecessary fonts already bundled into LO would be great.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.