https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44448
Heiko Tietze <heiko.tietze@documentfoundation.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|needsDevEval, needsUXEval |
CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
|.freedesktop.org |tion.org
--- Comment #33 from Heiko Tietze <heiko.tietze@documentfoundation.org> ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #32)
Is this change really desperately needed? Importance is high...
Given the number of duplicates and people on CC it is a highly expected
feature. So my take: keep it high. (It was questioned whether enhancement can
have a high importance at all. It makes a lot of sense to me and I like the
clear rules to set it.)
Skimming through the comments it looks like automatic update is welcome, even
without an option to switch it off. Rizal is right, OTOH, the option wouldn't
clutter too much and fits well into the current dialog.
Muhammet, as you were interested in this topic, could you please add a code
pointer? Shouldn't be too difficult.
Don't see the need for deveval, removing the keyword.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 44448] Option to auto-update Table of Contents, or question offered to do so at printing, is desirable · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.