https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134486
--- Comment #16 from Johnny_M <klasse@partyheld.de> ---
I agree. "Community Edition" would have been better, if any distinction is
desired. And I also think that the "intended for individual/personal" use is
misleading.
This is only about the lack of professional support after all (and pointing out
that there are supported LO *installations* (not *editions*) out there), not
any lack of functionality compared to another edition of LO, of which there is
none. (Unless re-branded.) Nor due to limitations on installation due to
licensing.
This all is already stated in the release notes after all, which is where this
topic belongs, IMHO.
And the volunteers promoting LO have a point here, too. I don't think they
re-compile LO to change the "edition" or the "intention". They support LO in
other ways than contributing code.
By the way, has any contributor organization sourced Inkscape from a
professional support provider, to be able to edit the LO logos, etc.? ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 134486] UI: Branding: LibreOffice Personal edition · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.