Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
June 2020 Archives by date, by thread · List index


https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112064

Heiko Tietze <heiko.tietze@documentfoundation.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|needsUXEval                 |
                 CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
                   |.freedesktop.org            |tion.org

--- Comment #16 from Heiko Tietze <heiko.tietze@documentfoundation.org> ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #11)
You only need a developer to implement it. You can ask the UX team in
advance whether they have any serious concerns about implementing such a
feature.

No serious objection, MSO can also apply columns.

I wonder how users understand columns in general - as attribute of the page
style it wont be applicable to footnotes and frames are also not helpful. So we
either name this property differently like "queues". Or have a (virtual) frame
behind the footnotes that allows this configuration.

The examples look like a preference of left to right before top to bottom
(given we have 3 columns, the number 1-3 are in row 1, 4 comes at col1,row2).
That's different to the current behavior with top to bottom first.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.