https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125268
--- Comment #31 from Jan-Marek Glogowski <glogow@fbihome.de> ---
As mentioned on IRC, I don't have a solution. I'll just use the log as an
infodump.
[14:51] <jmux> buovjaga: the change is just in 7.0, so plenty of time to agree
on some "final" solution. Probably start with a revert, so LO won't accidently
release the current state.
[14:52] <buovjaga> sure
[14:52] <jmux> And I agree with buovjaga that this is a primary a usability,
not a coding problem.
[14:56] <jmux> What I seem to understand is: character background handling is
different between ODF and DOCX. I don't know, why DOCX has shading and
highlight.
[14:57] <lo-dsgn-tg> <Kompilainenn> History
[14:58] <jmux> I don't think it's a good idea to open a DOCX and allow the user
to make changes, which aren't representable in the format.
[14:59] <jmux> As we already see, this results in frustration. Since the user
doesn't know about this limits, no blame on him.
[15:01] <jmux> So I guess the idea about the MS color palette is not the worst
to start with.
[15:03] <jmux> It obviously breaks, if the import document now actually uses
shading colors, as LO at this point can't know, if the color was highlight or
shading to begin with.
[15:05] <jmux> IMHO the UX team should provide a suggestion to handle these
constraints in their preferred way given the restrictions.
[15:05] <jmux> And then we can discuss, if an implementation is feasible.
[15:08] <jmux> And from my current POV, it doesn't look that there will be any
perfect solution. Also when the term highlight is already used different in
DOCX and ODF.
[15:11] <jmux> Maybe for DOCX documents there should be explicitly two ways to
set the background: highlight and shading, so the user can be aware of the
difference?
[15:16] <jmux> Or have a color picker with two areas, one depicting the 15
highlight colors and one for the shading?
[15:17] <jmux> BTW: what happens, if the user sets highlight and shading? Is
that possible?
[15:36] <lo-dsgn-tg> <Kompilainenn> We already have two variants for saving
highlights/shading for docx documnets
[15:36] <lo-dsgn-tg> <Kompilainenn> You'll find option in Tools-Options dialog
[15:42] <jmux> Kompilainenn: I'm aware of the compatibility settings. But I
don't think this is the most agreeable solution from the UX POV.
[15:43] <lo-dsgn-tg> <Kompilainenn> Why not? It worked many years
[15:44] <lo-dsgn-tg> <Kompilainenn> If UX-team will suggest a better solution
it would be good...
[15:46] <lo-dsgn-tg> <Kompilainenn> But I don't think it's an UX problem
[15:46] <lo-dsgn-tg> <Kompilainenn> In general
[15:48] <jmux> Maybe. I don't know if this is a common problem or not. I read
the bug as that it is, but really don't have a way to evaluate the claims.
[15:50] <jmux> If "we" decide the compatibility flags is still good, fair
enough. Less work to be done.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 125268] Wrong text highlight color when export document to doc/docx · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.