https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131315
Dieter <dgp-mail@gmx.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |89606, 129434
Keywords| |needsUXEval
CC| |dgp-mail@gmx.de,
| |libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
| |.freedesktop.org
--- Comment #1 from Dieter <dgp-mail@gmx.de> ---
As far as I can see, this reports leads to the general and very important
question, if LO should follow the rules for a special style (for example
Chicago Manual of Style). So I would change the bug summary to "Alphabetical
index should follow rules of Chicago Manual of Styles". Decision about that is
not trivial.
Perhaps alphabetical index follows the rules of a certain style guide. If this
is the case, there should be an information in LO help [1]
cc: Design Team for further dicussion an decision
[1]
https://help.libreoffice.org/7.0/en-GB/text/swriter/01/04120212.html?&DbPAR=WRITER&System=WIN
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89606
[Bug 89606] [META] Table of Contents and Indexes bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129434
[Bug 129434] [META] Writer (EDITING) Suggested bug fixes, enhancements and
features for authors.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 131315] Index: Implement letter by letter alphabetising · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.