Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
January 2020 Archives by date, by thread · List index


https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130181

--- Comment #6 from Mike Kaganski <mikekaganski@hotmail.com> ---
(In reply to stefane.guevremont from comment #5)
Conversely, would an option like "Embed only characters used in
document" be an available option, or an interesting feature to suggest?

While *that* would be a valid enhancement (in the sense that it's missing from
the suite; and that there are use cases for it), personally I would oppose that
suggestion. Embedding a font only partly effectively makes documents kind of
"read-only": on the target system, where the font is not installed, the
document would be rendered fine, but editing it would be either disabled
(because fonts in it don't allow to use other glyphs), or impaired (because any
glyph not embedded would use a substitution). IMO, an electronic document in
native format is meant for possible future edition; and font embedding should
not decrease its functionality. OTOH, there are formats specifically created
for archiving purposes: PDF only embeds glyphs used in the document, just what
you want.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.