https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129807
Heiko Tietze <heiko.tietze@documentfoundation.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|needsUXEval |
CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
|.freedesktop.org |tion.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #1 from Heiko Tietze <heiko.tietze@documentfoundation.org> ---
The benefit of this proposal is clear. Drawback is the nested dialog- always an
ugly solution. In particular you cannot quickly switch from one to another
table or database. Acceptable, in my opinion.
We need a static label, the button, and could, if space is left, make the
database field dropdown a list (big advantage to collect the several fields).
Database: <Foo>
Table: <Bar>
[Select Address List]
Fields: [AAAA]
[BBBB]
(Ideally, the right list aligns with the left list. Meaning Database & Table go
somewhere else.)
We could improve the dialog with common dual list interactions but loose the
ability to configure directly (eg. insert comma, breaks etc.)
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #0)
There is a drawback here: currently it's possible to add fields from
different registered databases/tables... However, I highly doubt that this
possibility is really useful enough to keep it...
Fully agree.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 129807] Replace "Database" and "Table" selectors in Envelope dialog with "Select Address List" button, like in Mail Merge Wizard · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.