https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128973
Mike Kaganski <mikekaganski@hotmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rgb.mldc@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Mike Kaganski <mikekaganski@hotmail.com> ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #1)
But then I'd suggest a style fall back to 'Text Body' will need some design
tweaks. Majority of language scripts are best rendered as the font designer
intended with Single line spacing. That has been achieved with metrics of
the 'Default' fallback paragraph style--Single line space and no additional
inter paragraph spacing.
As a new fallback, the current 'Text Body' line spacing at 115% of font
metric with inter paragraph spacing is better adjusted to 100% of font
metric, with no inter paragraph spacing.
I suppose we need some new bug about that, which would block this (and
tdf#47295), with specific discussion of problems that 115% creates (in which
scripts; in which scenarios: lists, tables, ... ?), with screenshots etc. I
suppose that RGB's tdf#94464 was also fixed in not a way that OP imagined,
because of lack of understanding of complexity behind fonts and their metrics
and typography in general. So some kind of clean new report (meta?) with
systematic description of visible problems and their origins would be useful
IMO.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 128973] Create a per-document "Paragraph style used by default" setting · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.