https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127983
V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dr.khaled.hosny@gmail.com,
| |libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
| |.freedesktop.org,
| |quikee@gmail.com,
| |vstuart.foote@utsa.edu
--- Comment #1 from V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu> ---
Can't get too excited about it. Seems pretty limited coverage with conflicting
'Pro' distributions that would break any LO distributed version.
Would rather see us fully implement support for OTF COLR/CPAL tables (bug
104403), and OTF SVG tables (bug 105488), or OTF CBDT/SBIX tables (bug 121327)
and fully implement use of the color EmojiOne font we already deply.
And of course in addition to flexibly handling color, there is OTF Variable
Font to consider for layout and printing/export (bug 103596, bug 108497); would
rather get some of that implementation worked out and only then consider what
additional fonts are appropriate to bundle.
@Tomaz are we still thinking of 'colorizing' SVG icons/glyphs in response to
os/DE theme settings, and for better HiDPI use?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 127983] Font Awesome · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.