https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126277
Heiko Tietze <heiko.tietze@documentfoundation.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|heiko.tietze@documentfounda |libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
|tion.org |.freedesktop.org
Resolution|MOVED |---
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Keywords| |needsUXEval
--- Comment #9 from Heiko Tietze <heiko.tietze@documentfoundation.org> ---
We talked about this topic in the design meeting. While more organization is
always welcome, the drawback of another levels is the unclear relevance of this
new style. In case of Character styles it could be "Standard" (Emphasis, Strong
Emphasis, Source Text...), "Annotation" (Endnote, Footenote...), "References"
(Links...). While users can inherit manually (and we can do programatically)
it's absolutely not clear if properties are taken.
So as long we do not get more clear opinions to change we keep the status quo
(REOPENED for more input).
As alternative solution Bogdan suggested to introduce a new filter type, let's
say "Simple Hierarchical", and just filter out the not so frequently used
styles.
This applies also to bug 126258 and bug 126257.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 126277] Writer Character Styles are not intuitive to read · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.