https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126403
V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |needsUXEval
Summary|html color palett |Revise layout of HTML color
| |palette swatches
CC| |libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
| |.freedesktop.org,
| |rb.henschel@t-online.de,
| |vstuart.foote@utsa.edu
--- Comment #3 from V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu> ---
I've no problem with reordering the swatches (note they've been alphabetical by
name since X11 era, and now here they are grouped by color hue).
Also, I'm fine with adding the extra white space (#ffffff) swatches to give
structure to the 12 column color rows.
I did not check color by color, but if ALL X11-SVG 1.0 colors in the HTML.soc
are still named against their sRGB value--this would not disrupt the import of
SVG or of Web pages. But none of the named colors can be dropped from the
palette.
I only object to duplicating a color & with a new color name positioned to the
last column of each row. I acknowledge the intent of making the color pick
easier visually, but don't think it is necessary here.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 126403] Revise layout of HTML color palette swatches · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.