https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66890
--- Comment #15 from Timur <gtimur@gmail.com> ---
Created attachment 152499
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=152499&action=edit
Simple test
What we have here:
- this is a RFE, that was never evaluated from UX, so I add it;
- p199999991 himself wrongly set to New and twice Reopened, so I set back to
Unconfirmed;
- distinguished Eike wrote that this should not be accepted;
- MSO behaves as requested here, overwriting if there are no empty cells in
between (tested with MSO 2016);
- this bug is not opposite to Bug 108209;
- an option should be considered to determine behavior, so that overwriting is
possible, not as default;
- even if this is accepted it should be low/lowest priority enhancement.
p199999991, you are advised NOT to change the status anymore.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 66890] EDITING: Double-clicking fill handle does not fill down the entire range · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.