Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
March 2019 Archives by date, by thread · List index


https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119563

--- Comment #9 from Heiko Tietze <tietze.heiko@gmail.com> ---
Created attachment 149879
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=149879&action=edit
Document properties in inkscape

(In reply to ffs from comment #8)
Personally I'd stick it in the metadata of the image rather than a private
LO tag.

We need to take care about compatibility, ie. roundtrips of the odf with other
tools like OpenOffice, Calligra, with alien formats such as from MSO and when
exporting/importing the image as SVG, for example.

As of SVG, Inkscape has some tags shown in the attachment. Those are saved in
the metadata

<metadata
     id="metadata5">
    <rdf:RDF>
      <cc:Work
         rdf:about="">
        <dc:format>image/svg+xml</dc:format>
        <dc:type
           rdf:resource="http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage"; />
        <dc:title>Test</dc:title>
        <dc:date>11.3.2019</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>
          <cc:Agent>
            <dc:title>HT</dc:title>
          </cc:Agent>
        </dc:creator>
        <dc:rights>
          <cc:Agent>
            <dc:title>CC0</dc:title>
          </cc:Agent>
        </dc:rights>
        <dc:publisher>
          <cc:Agent>
            <dc:title>HT</dc:title>
          </cc:Agent>
        </dc:publisher>
        <dc:identifier>none</dc:identifier>
        <dc:source>self-made</dc:source>
        <dc:language>English</dc:language>
        <dc:subject>
          <rdf:Bag>
            <rdf:li>test</rdf:li>
            <rdf:li>rectangle</rdf:li>
          </rdf:Bag>
        </dc:subject>
        <dc:description>This is a test.</dc:description>
        <dc:contributor>
          <cc:Agent>
            <dc:title>RH</dc:title>
          </cc:Agent>
        </dc:contributor>
        <cc:license
           rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/"; />
      </cc:Work>
      <cc:License
         rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/";>
        <cc:permits
           rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction"; />
        <cc:permits
           rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution"; />
        <cc:permits
           rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks"; />
      </cc:License>
    </rdf:RDF>
  </metadata>

Sounds like some work for the developers.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.