https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120722
--- Comment #14 from Regina Henschel <rb.henschel@t-online.de> ---
Created attachment 146044
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=146044&action=edit
handle for 96dpi
I see that "Handle at 96dpi" = 1.6 * "Handle of reporter" (approximately). That
corresponds to 100% compared to 174%.
Or calculate directly: A handle has currently 9 pixel width, at 96dpi that
results in 2.38mm. That is already very small. But with higher dpi, e.g. 167dpi
of the reporters screen, it is only 1.4mm. That is really too small.
Therefore I think it is a valid request to get larger handles.
This proposal adds a frame around a central square. That is not really bad as
long as the white part inside is semi-transparent. There are other proposals,
e.g to increase the handle size if higher dpi is used, or to enlarge the
handles for higher zoom.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 120722] In the drawing, the functions of "normal preset contact" and "magnify preset contact" are added. · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.