https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119738
--- Comment #6 from Heiko Tietze <tietze.heiko@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to BogdanB from comment #5)
It's just a problem of numbering. You have Figure 1, than Ilustration 1,
than Figure 2, than Ilustration 2, depending what version of LO we use for
inserting Figure or Ilustration.
Sure, but what options do we have? I'm strongly against reverting as Figure is
the standard term used in scientific publications. Adding some code to check
what caption has been used in the current document? Difficult since you
intentionally can have both Illustration and Figure. So I vote for the third
door with the zonk. Meaning you have to be careful and change the caption in
non-standard documents.
Besides I wonder why you accepted Illustration as caption. Wouldn't it make
more sense to switch those labels to Figure?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 119738] Image caption, inconsistency: caption for images is now "figure" and no longer "illustration" · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.