https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112697
Cor Nouws <cno@nouenoff.nl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |cno@nouenoff.nl
--- Comment #13 from Cor Nouws <cno@nouenoff.nl> ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #11)
(In reply to Regina Henschel)
...
(a) silent rename of source master page and add it as new master page
(b) dialog about name conflict
(c) silent apply of standard page object from source to target master page.
Option b) is evil as users have no idea what's going on behind the scenes.
The question is if users expect the source object to be pasted without
modification, which is a) (adding another master), or to paste with the
target style meaning d) paste raw objects except direct formatting, but
likely not to modify the target master as in c). In case both/all options
are relevant we have to add an option.
a) looks most logic to me.
leaves slide as is;
if needed, user knows how to apply master page to change.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 112697] Master slide incorrectly applied to pasted slide from a different presentation if the master slides have the same names (sometimes, not consistent) · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.