https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117428
V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
See Also| |https://bugs.documentfounda
| |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58
| |941
--- Comment #11 from V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu> ---
I don't believe Khaled has volunteered to tackle the needed refactoring to the
PDF export filter and GUI. Check History--clearly not assigned as Khaled
removed himself, back to NEW
Otherwise, is there any objection that implementing an /ActualText flag "per
word" will mean string selection to copy from PDF will be limited to word
bounds? Personally I think we need the tagging more than the partial string
copy.
Assuring correct handling combining glyphs and Unicode script--and presumably
OTF font features when implemented (as for bug 58941)--is the desired outcome.
Justified from a11y perspective, and needed for accuracy supporting CTL
scripts.
Is that the UX consensus?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 117428] add an option to PDF export dialog to do ActualText per word · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.