https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115737
--- Comment #8 from Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #5)
I wouldn't put much effort in this feature as there are alternative ways [1].
Despite of being just another opinion, the method suggested adds some graphic
to the page, while the watermark discussed here is using text. On a sheet of
paper the result may not make much difference, but on some export format like
PDF it will. Also if there is a better alternative method, wouldn't be the
logical conclusion to drop this feature? So why was id added at all, then?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 115737] Allow more font and position formatting for watermarks · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.