https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115737
Heiko Tietze <tietze.heiko@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|olivier.hallot@documentfoun |
|dation.org |
--- Comment #7 from Heiko Tietze <tietze.heiko@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Thomas Lendo from comment #6)
I wouldn't close this bug neither as WFM nor as WONTFIX. What's not
important for someone can be important for another one.
We spoil UX by adding unneeded options. How about word art, effects,
spacing/kerning, borders etc.? If, as suggested by Ulrich, the watermark
becomes kind of a layer with full access to text properties the common dialogs
work well. But we have to take care about what we duplicate in new UIs.
Watermark feature is already available via 'Format > Watermark...' in 5.4,
6.0 and 6.1. Enhancement request for importing into page dialog see bug
107996.
Thanks for clarification. Both makes sense, removing Olivier again.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 115737] Allow more font and position formatting for watermarks · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.