https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115311
--- Comment #3 from Heiko Tietze <tietze.heiko@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Kenneth Hanson from comment #2)
I strongly disagree. The ability to nest character styles is extremely
important for complex documents. It's the only sane way to represent
semantic or formatting considerations that are orthogonal to each other.
Can we find a good example? Something like but better than:
* in-text citation with highlighted words.
"And she said:<i>Though shalt <b>NEVER</b> format directly!</i>, and went
away." (<i> and <b> as html-like illustration of character style 'cite' and
'emphasis').
In the example you get NEVER in italic from cite plus bold from emphasis but I
think a direct formatting would be fine here just for simplicity of the UI.
When you present Change and Apply (or Add) I doubt that users understand that.
Visualization could be done via tree where the second style is a children of
the first (still not easy to understand).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 115311] UI missing for nesting character styles · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.