[Libreoffice-ux-advise] Dropping the UX-Advise ML from META and topical BZ issues

Heiko,

Have noticed you are liberally deleting the UX-Advise ML recipient from BZ META issues and some 
topical issues. Is there a reason?  

While these issues may have had their Keyword "needUXEval" removed (or not assigned) use of the 
UX-Advise ML remains an efficient way to route the BZ comments to the UX and Design team. 

Every BZ issue you remove it from deletes that topic from visibility by the team.  And folks have 
to manually add themselves to an issue should they desire to follow along--which for most of the 
META we do.

It costs nothing to keep the ML recipient in place (personally with mail rule filters I route all 
the UX-Design related mail out of my inbox to a mail folder where they can be reviewed while I am 
thinking about LibreOffice).

If with discussion there is some consensus to do this, I'll concede--but my personal preference is 
to leave the ML in place for the META and topical issues in BZ. Folks that find the volume too high 
can take the ML as digest or even remove themselves from the ML.

Stuart