https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113604
--- Comment #4 from Regina Henschel <rb.henschel@t-online.de> ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #3)
How is this function expected to work regarding constraints. I mean col A
and B are defined as style:use-optimal-column-width so one of the two has to
give room when both grow. What happens when I enter a lot of text, or have
just one character? Without a (adjustable) minimum and maximum the feature
makes not much sense.
I don't know. The spec has no rule for it. The text of section 20.383 is:
The style:use-optimal-column-width attribute specifies that a column width
should be recalculated automatically if content in the column changes.
The defined values for the style:use-optimal-column-width attribute are:
• false: column width should not be recalculated automatically if content
in the column changes.
• true: column width should be recalculated automatically if content in the
column changes.
The current behavior in UI in LibreOffice is to adjust the total width of the
table; and in case the total width would have to be enlarged but that is not
possible, the command is ignored.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 113604] Optimal column width of table in Writer is cumbersome and not persistent · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.