https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113603
Heiko Tietze <tietze.heiko@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |needsDevEval
--- Comment #6 from Heiko Tietze <tietze.heiko@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Christian Lehmann from comment #5)
...I am, of course, in no position to fight for my proposal.
As a user you are in the best position to fight. Don't hesitate to go ahead.
- When you write "The proposal doesn't consider a selection within the table
(e.g. A2:B3)", you are not referring to my proposal, are you? Its entire
section 2 is devoted to this problem.
You talk about this use case in the first 2) but not further. Don't think
anything is missing but wanted to add this for clarification- current behavior
is good for cells only selections.
Other than that I like how iWorks does the job (Jay's screencast). Looks like a
lot of work, not really suited for GSoC. Any dev opinion about this?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 113603] Enhancement: unified table management in Writer · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.