https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101349
--- Comment #20 from Heiko Tietze <tietze.heiko@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to andreas_k from comment #19)
I'd like to separate the table styles into two areas
While the paragraph styles provides an hierarchical organization we do not have
it for other types. And actually going with only two top-level categories
(print and screen) makes not much sense to me.
On the other hand I fully agree with a couple of _plain_ styles. But in the end
it's up to the user to choose the right one and to layout the document. Table
styles are not capable to align depending on the content (numbers, text,
currency...), you would have to provide different variants, which is awkward
IMHO. Table style can define padding but not the column/table width and row
height. Check out
https://design.blog.documentfoundation.org/2015/12/13/style-your-tables/
And finally I would wait for the outcome of the survey. We want to keep the
community involved rather than design by committee. That doesn't mean that the
likely high-rated "Scientific" style cannot be refined or supplemented later.
But if the users down-vote "3D", for instance, we shouldn't invest much in this
variant.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 101349] Default set of table styles · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.