[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 106875] Find & Replace attribute not self-explanatory

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106875

V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|needsUXEval                 |
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |olivier.hallot@documentfoun
                   |                            |dation.org,
                   |                            |vstuart.foote@utsa.edu
             Blocks|                            |80430
         Resolution|---                         |NOTABUG

--- Comment #3 from V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu> ---
With current 5.3 release the built-in help and the on-line help provide the
related articles [1-3]:

Find & Replace
Searching for Attributes
Attributes

As the actual attributes are composites (not individual settings) their
description is conceptual in Technical-English. Their terseness is a
requirement of restraining the panel size for labeling check-box widget
elements (and tool-tips) in the GUI. The linkage from the dialog is correct.

The help articles here might be cleaned up a bit, but they provide the
appropriate framework for the l10n translation effort.

In that context, edits/revisions are always welcome, but this is not a bug.

And of course, for emerging features, the Documentation team is always in need
of good technical writers to incorporate content into the "published" User
Guides.

=-ref-=
[1]
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/help/source/text/shared/01/02100000.xhp

[2]
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/help/source/text/shared/guide/find_attributes.xhp

[3]
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/help/source/text/shared/01/02100200.xhp


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80430
[Bug 80430] [META] LOCALHELP: Features x Documentation gap
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.