https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106681
--- Comment #6 from vermontpoet@gmail.com ---
//I'm in favor of WONTFIX because basic direct formatting is expected by most
users (comment 3). Surely we want to educate them we also do not want to become
something like Latex.//
I'm not sure I understand the basis for this objection? It's not an either/or
situation. Allowing end-users to access soft-formatting as easily as
hard-formatting in no way defeats the expectations of most users. I see no
reason why the default wouldn't remain hard-formatting.
What I'm asking for is the ability to more easily access soft-formatting. Were
LO to allow button assignment or re-assignment of buttons (or shortcut keys) as
a post installation customization, any user content with hard-formatting would
notice no difference at all.
As for the Latex comparison, I would point out that soft-formatting is already
a fully integrated feature set of LO! I'm not asking for the introduction of
features "like LATEX". They're already there. LO is already "something like
Latex" as far as that goes. All I'm asking is that soft-formatting be made more
easily accessible for writers increasingly writing for ebooks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 106681] Feature Request: Ability to assign character styles to toolbar buttons... · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.