https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104048
--- Comment #5 from Heiko Tietze <tietze.heiko@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #4)
I think, the names should be exactly as the color keywords standardized by
W3C; for example listed in
https://www.w3.org/wiki/CSS/Properties/color/keywords and because they are
keywords, they should not be translated.
I started with this list and moved forward to Wikipedia (references are in the
header of the palette) because the sequence there is more usable. Having the
basic colors first (and again below) makes the set untidy. The names are
exactly as listed there including the camel case, which is usually something to
avoid.
About translating names please follow also bug 104053.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.