https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101252
Heiko Tietze <tietze.heiko@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|needsUXEval |easyHack, needsDevEval
--- Comment #8 from Heiko Tietze <tietze.heiko@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to lafeuil from comment #7)
... I thought it is not very complicated to implement it.
That might be true. But an alphabetical index and an user-defined index that
can be sorted alphabetically adds confusion. In the long term we should come up
with a better/easier solution.
I have to admit that your workflow is still not entirely clear to me. The usual
operation for footnotes is straightforward, so why do you add a ToC there
(shouldn't it be restricted to the current page)?
Anyway, the change is pretty simple and makes sense for the user-defined index,
which has to be as flexible as possible. So I remove the needsUXEval and
suggest to reuse what is there in the alphabetical index.
Easyhack?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 101252] Alphabetical User-Defined index · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.