Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
November 2016 Archives by date, by thread · List index


https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101252

--- Comment #7 from lafeuil@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #6)
Created attachment 128404 [details]
User-defined vs. Alphabetical index

Why don't you use an alphabetical index?

With an alphabetical index, I can't easily add the definition of the word in
the footer. In the document, I can't refer to the index entry defined in the
alphabetical index. So, I have to maintain the same definition in the index
entries and in the document.

With the User-defined index, I can maintain one reference of the definition.
The definition is created in the document (in the footer) with a custom style.
With this custom style, I can refer it in my index. I have to maintain a single
list of definition in my document.

Maybe, if the user experience was better with alphabetical index and index
entries, I think I would use it. But there are some limitations :
 * you can't view all index entries or you have to maintain it in a text file.
 * you can't refer to an index entry in the document.

The alphabetical index is more complicated to manage than a user-defined index
and I proposed this improvement because I thought it is not very complicated to
implement it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.