https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101442
--- Comment #30 from Luke <lukebenes@hotmail.com> ---
It seems we're moving forward with this change. If we must change URL links
from hyperlink to link, shouldn't we first come up with a new name for internal
use of link frames and images? Otherwise how do you know if it's a URL link or
an internal link. Maybe we could call internal links, chains instead?
How does 'chain frame' sound? Others have suggested clarifying when it's not a
hyperlink. But I think it's better to just use a different term.
Overall, I think replacing a specific, well defined term with a broad
colloquial terms is a bad idea. For example, I know people that use LibreOffice
as primitive HTML generator. For those users, this change could make thing
confusing. We should have one term that is reserved for making hyperlinks when
exported.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 101442] Hyperlink is terribly dated vocabulary · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.