https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101193
Cor Nouws <cno@nouenoff.nl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |cno@nouenoff.nl
--- Comment #12 from Cor Nouws <cno@nouenoff.nl> ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #11)
Surprising how demanding the specs are sometimes. This paragraph should be
changed as the tool is responsible how functions are presented. Without a
use case, scenario, workflow, or any reason, this statement makes no sense.
Maybe someone can give some insight on the reasons for this detailed demand in
the specs? From contact with someone in accessibility, looking for those
attributes, I wouldn't be surprised if it comes from that expertise.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 101193] Return object Name and Description dialog buttons to object context menus · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.