https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99595
Yousuf Philips (jay) <philipz85@hotmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |
|.freedesktop.org |
--- Comment #8 from Yousuf Philips (jay) <philipz85@hotmail.com> ---
(In reply to Hillie from comment #7)
One last comment (at the risk of beating a dead horse): I mostly agree with
these points above. I still maintain though, to me (and I may be alone :-)
) it would be optimal if the default repeat last command was easy to type
because I think users often go to it multiple times when the original
command was hard to type and required two hands (to me that is the purpose).
Ctrl+Y is better than ctrl+shift+Y but due to the location of Y on the
keyboard, it seems hard to type ctrl+y with one hand. To me you want to be
able to move around with one hand, making different selections while hitting
repeat with the other.
Yes we would ideally want to have commonly used functions to be accessible with
shortcuts that use 1 or 2 keys, though this isnt always possible with the many
already assigned shortcuts, unifying shortcuts across modules/apps, and also
unifying the shortcuts across operating systems.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 99595] Improve a couple of keyboard shortcuts. · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.