https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95357
--- Comment #8 from kalirren@gmail.com ---
In general, where should we give comments to UX?
As a user, I think it would be best to not have any special case for
"replacements" as a type of change. I think this important because users will
vary in how they replace text in different situations (e.g., some will have
insertions before the deletions, some will have deletions before the
insertions, some will have insertions, deletions, and more insertions again.)
Please treat every insertion and deletion as a separate change, and move
between them sequentially. I don't mind clicking "accept"/"reject" twice for
each replacement; I do mind if I cannot trust which part of the document I am
accepting or rejecting in cases where multiple replacements are concatenated. I
also mind if I start at the beginning of a document, accept and reject changes
to the end of the document, and discover I have not accepted/rejected every
proposed change.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 95357] TRACK CHANGES: Change tracking movement/ action are inconsistent for replacements · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.